Birdwatch Note
2024-10-16 00:36:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The text on the left of the screen clearly states it's fake, and even includes the original posters name in it.
Written by 9FBEB9098F3BC5CCC4B3DA62C366E5C3D59C81BC03134EFCE15545C84FB9219E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846222754032369801
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846349581468291252
- noteId - 1846349581468291252
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9FBEB9098F3BC5CCC4B3DA62C366E5C3D59C81BC03134EFCE15545C84FB9219E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729039018396
- tweetId - 1846222754032369801
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - The text on the left of the screen clearly states it's fake, and even includes the original posters name in it.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-15 23:16:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 22:41:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 04:43:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 20:30:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 01:59:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 23:53:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 21:34:30 -0500 | Rating Details |