Birdwatch Note
2024-10-15 17:36:04 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN- While this CN would be useful on the tweet that this user is quote tweeting, it doesnt make sense to have one on this specific tweet as the user is just speculating. Please reply to tweet instead.
Written by AD00B5E9E25E270599B57F8F9D6CF4CF4F023425CB5374CCFB7DFAFDA01EB1F5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846145140689080683
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846243660477976711
- noteId - 1846243660477976711
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - AD00B5E9E25E270599B57F8F9D6CF4CF4F023425CB5374CCFB7DFAFDA01EB1F5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729013764863
- tweetId - 1846145140689080683
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN- While this CN would be useful on the tweet that this user is quote tweeting, it doesnt make sense to have one on this specific tweet as the user is just speculating. Please reply to tweet instead.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-16 03:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 02:17:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 05:04:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 00:30:23 -0500 | Rating Details |