Birdwatch Note
2024-10-15 13:23:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: Ersichtlich keine Inhaltsangabe des Tweets, sondern persönliche Meinung zur geschlussfolgerten Haltung des Autors. Daher ist der Ausgangstweet nicht sachlich unwahr. Kritik daran gehört in die Replys.
Written by 56CBC3237CB9911FA0D97E898D61169CCA0C00A5EDC86A44F9865873ABF11B92
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845808653925802010
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846180059737952552
- noteId - 1846180059737952552
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 56CBC3237CB9911FA0D97E898D61169CCA0C00A5EDC86A44F9865873ABF11B92 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728998601265
- tweetId - 1845808653925802010
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN: Ersichtlich keine Inhaltsangabe des Tweets, sondern persönliche Meinung zur geschlussfolgerten Haltung des Autors. Daher ist der Ausgangstweet nicht sachlich unwahr. Kritik daran gehört in die Replys.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-15 18:23:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 09:23:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-20 05:04:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 14:53:50 -0500 | Rating Details |