Birdwatch Note
2024-10-14 19:32:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
And? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)
Written by 32A8D0F5DC4508692FAC83024E65105B2329995EECC452F2D0D7446D53FCDCB9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845241036848890027
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1845910655511007335
- noteId - 1845910655511007335
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 32A8D0F5DC4508692FAC83024E65105B2329995EECC452F2D0D7446D53FCDCB9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728934370292
- tweetId - 1845241036848890027
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- And? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-15 04:08:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 15:08:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 17:42:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 16:37:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-15 05:35:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 22:06:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 15:32:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-15 04:57:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-15 01:10:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-14 16:09:54 -0500 | Rating Details |