Birdwatch Note
2024-10-13 19:36:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Obviously NNN the proposed note is semantic nonsense. Colloquially people frequently say "(any number) is the charm)" depending upon how many previous attempts there were.
Written by 99D99E2A3A6D40CC640209BB8D3172C45DD5EF789CCBB87965535DA584119953
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845314436124508610
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1845549091729674699
- noteId - 1845549091729674699
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 99D99E2A3A6D40CC640209BB8D3172C45DD5EF789CCBB87965535DA584119953 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728848166769
- tweetId - 1845314436124508610
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Obviously NNN the proposed note is semantic nonsense. Colloquially people frequently say "(any number) is the charm)" depending upon how many previous attempts there were.