Birdwatch Note
2024-10-13 16:15:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The CN proposed above proves the source of the claim. Regardless if it is from 2022, it is claimed and is not disputed by any other reputable source. https://t.co/FQ2XDjTyoC
Written by 9FE67A705927491138B0847540F8946E2E41223CBDE6F737069BA57EEDD3510E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845410024731930848
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1845498682239758402
- noteId - 1845498682239758402
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9FE67A705927491138B0847540F8946E2E41223CBDE6F737069BA57EEDD3510E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728836148211
- tweetId - 1845410024731930848
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The CN proposed above proves the source of the claim. Regardless if it is from 2022, it is claimed and is not disputed by any other reputable source. https://t.co/FQ2XDjTyoC
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-13 12:24:42 -0500 | Rating Details |