Birdwatch Note
2024-10-11 11:05:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
According to a digital forensics expert, these images were likely generated by artificial intelligence. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36JU2AM
Written by 7A4A2D16B3513F8292E85DD49D11C8BFB4B54EDB2A2363FABA6B825B5D0F3B9C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844284046253359304
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1844695792600429008
- noteId - 1844695792600429008
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7A4A2D16B3513F8292E85DD49D11C8BFB4B54EDB2A2363FABA6B825B5D0F3B9C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728644724404
- tweetId - 1844284046253359304
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- According to a digital forensics expert, these images were likely generated by artificial intelligence. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36JU2AM
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-12 06:34:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 16:19:34 -0500 | Rating Details |