Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-11 07:32:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - The current proposed note, although providing detail, belongs in the comments. It does not alter the validity of the initial post.

Written by F49FB71D90B3243FE8EA72C2E07A5B8F3AFD4ADFD3ED5767C6F37A6BB4E96F2F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844446546336837650

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1844642199537086601
  • noteId - 1844642199537086601
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F49FB71D90B3243FE8EA72C2E07A5B8F3AFD4ADFD3ED5767C6F37A6BB4E96F2F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728631946822
  • tweetId - 1844446546336837650
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - The current proposed note, although providing detail, belongs in the comments. It does not alter the validity of the initial post.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-12 03:57:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-11 16:08:49 -0500 Rating Details