Birdwatch Note
2024-10-11 06:03:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Stip abusing CN. If you don't agree, you can show off your own analysis in the comments.
Written by 80C91072F9B06C4A309968DC9F7FAC0E28E22EEBAEE414EC9D6D53C268C8F70C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844408368095494314
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1844619892625940548
- noteId - 1844619892625940548
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 80C91072F9B06C4A309968DC9F7FAC0E28E22EEBAEE414EC9D6D53C268C8F70C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728626628439
- tweetId - 1844408368095494314
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Stip abusing CN. If you don't agree, you can show off your own analysis in the comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-11 10:53:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 07:19:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 03:12:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 11:44:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 06:00:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 01:07:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-13 05:54:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 16:59:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 10:25:55 -0500 | Rating Details |