Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-11 01:12:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

well, that’s because it is. https://im.rediff.com/news/2016/nov/12kamala-harris-3.jpg?w=670&h=900

Written by F1DC9E14B9A8F6A063F4B607611E77D36DC533121E60425B81AF2629E9F04B76
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844478660851662958

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1844546703463940438
  • noteId - 1844546703463940438
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F1DC9E14B9A8F6A063F4B607611E77D36DC533121E60425B81AF2629E9F04B76 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728609178784
  • tweetId - 1844478660851662958
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • well, that’s because it is. https://im.rediff.com/news/2016/nov/12kamala-harris-3.jpg?w=670&h=900

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-10 20:22:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-12 21:00:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 21:34:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 20:58:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 21:30:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-11-09 15:15:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-10-10 20:24:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 20:14:58 -0500 Rating Details