Birdwatch Note
2024-10-10 19:57:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN/ Independientemente de la respuesta del Real Madrid, aunque puede ser cierta, el post transmite cuál ha sido la denuncia de los vecinos, y conforme a la noticia no es engañoso.
Written by 93AC586CC142AFBE7935B2C3B13722A7B27946485EBFB6F4648180AF0A4ABA15
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844439160058491152
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1844467369000783874
- noteId - 1844467369000783874
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 93AC586CC142AFBE7935B2C3B13722A7B27946485EBFB6F4648180AF0A4ABA15 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728590263973
- tweetId - 1844439160058491152
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN/ Independientemente de la respuesta del Real Madrid, aunque puede ser cierta, el post transmite cuál ha sido la denuncia de los vecinos, y conforme a la noticia no es engañoso.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-10 16:01:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-11 04:58:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-10 16:25:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-10 15:25:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-10 15:17:37 -0500 | Rating Details |