Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-10 05:28:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - proposed note is irrelevant, as this is clearly a video of the individual referred to as "Lieutenant Dan", and he is clearly not in a shelter as suggested by the proposed note.

Written by 071E4851EF8ECACBB170AA78C5E0C8C95C68B8C037570AE1D2B447DFAC626E4C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1844223472832241982

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1844248522251497612
  • noteId - 1844248522251497612
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 071E4851EF8ECACBB170AA78C5E0C8C95C68B8C037570AE1D2B447DFAC626E4C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728538086842
  • tweetId - 1844223472832241982
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - proposed note is irrelevant, as this is clearly a video of the individual referred to as "Lieutenant Dan", and he is clearly not in a shelter as suggested by the proposed note.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-10 15:59:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 00:36:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 00:29:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-10 00:28:36 -0500 Rating Details