Birdwatch Note
2024-10-10 03:51:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Lo único relevante del caso es que antes de votar el texto que se vota llega a sus manos y su voto fue afirmativo.
Written by 3967CE9DE8578E518927DDBF165BCF1786F45A5822636EBF22BD98B909EA2648
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1843618248073302345
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1844224332198814143
- noteId - 1844224332198814143
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3967CE9DE8578E518927DDBF165BCF1786F45A5822636EBF22BD98B909EA2648 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728532319484
- tweetId - 1843618248073302345
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Lo único relevante del caso es que antes de votar el texto que se vota llega a sus manos y su voto fue afirmativo.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-16 07:00:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-10 00:23:24 -0500 | Rating Details |