Birdwatch Note
2024-10-09 18:16:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The post expresses a factually accurate statement regarding a vote in the Scottish Parliament. Leave additional information to the replies, nothing requires context or further information.
Written by EDB99C67B1B4698173185BF9129B402AC694A512689B062BD6A5D8701DF004A4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1843685845456617747
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1844079495013335409
- noteId - 1844079495013335409
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EDB99C67B1B4698173185BF9129B402AC694A512689B062BD6A5D8701DF004A4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728497787609
- tweetId - 1843685845456617747
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The post expresses a factually accurate statement regarding a vote in the Scottish Parliament. Leave additional information to the replies, nothing requires context or further information.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-10 08:52:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-09 16:37:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-10 10:09:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-09 14:42:06 -0500 | Rating Details |