Birdwatch Note
2024-10-09 07:12:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Arguments based on the author's tweet, which reflects personal opinion rather than factual claims, should be discussed in the comments section, not in CN.
Written by 03E7B1253C57A0D8D0306586F400924FA162193827E123BD700527DB11BA4CCA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1843730823708852587
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1843912493606797703
- noteId - 1843912493606797703
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 03E7B1253C57A0D8D0306586F400924FA162193827E123BD700527DB11BA4CCA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728457971370
- tweetId - 1843730823708852587
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Arguments based on the author's tweet, which reflects personal opinion rather than factual claims, should be discussed in the comments section, not in CN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-10 09:50:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-09 04:39:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-09 02:37:52 -0500 | Rating Details |