Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-08 08:40:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

実際は、ワクチンの感染発症入院重症死亡予防効果はいずれもランダム化比較試験のメタ解析で確認され https://www.carenet.com/news/general/carenet/56042 その後も21年期やオミクロン初期の観察研究のメタ解析でも発症重症予防効果は示され↓ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00409-1/fulltext 2価ワクチンの接種の有効性は二価ワクチンの未接種者や全ワクチン未接種者と比べた統制された観察研究のメタ解析でも確認され↓ https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1322396/full https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.10.24301107v1 xbbワクチンの有効性も下記に厚労省よりまとめられ https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_yuukousei_anzensei.html WHOは下記にオミクロン期の予防効果の数百もの研究をあげ https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf際限なく世界中で確認され続けており感染研もワクチンの予防効果に根拠がないかのようなネットデマに注意喚起を促しています↓ https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/others/12342-2023-10-30.html

Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1843436042713755807

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1843572219995402505
  • noteId - 1843572219995402505
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728376843819
  • tweetId - 1843436042713755807
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 実際は、ワクチンの感染発症入院重症死亡予防効果はいずれもランダム化比較試験のメタ解析で確認され https://www.carenet.com/news/general/carenet/56042 その後も21年期やオミクロン初期の観察研究のメタ解析でも発症重症予防効果は示され↓ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00409-1/fulltext 2価ワクチンの接種の有効性は二価ワクチンの未接種者や全ワクチン未接種者と比べた統制された観察研究のメタ解析でも確認され↓ https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1322396/full https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.10.24301107v1 xbbワクチンの有効性も下記に厚労省よりまとめられ https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_yuukousei_anzensei.html WHOは下記にオミクロン期の予防効果の数百もの研究をあげ https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf際限なく世界中で確認され続けており感染研もワクチンの予防効果に根拠がないかのようなネットデマに注意喚起を促しています↓ https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/others/12342-2023-10-30.html

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-08 08:20:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 05:20:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:42:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:40:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:31:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:29:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 03:49:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 06:22:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 05:39:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 11:54:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 08:51:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 08:27:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 05:44:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:42:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:31:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 04:04:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 05:41:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 05:30:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 03:47:29 -0500 Rating Details