Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-07 03:34:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - der Nutzer stellt eine (rhetorische Frage), die Diskussion kann in den Kommentaren erfolgen, es ist keine Community Note nötig oder angebracht.

Written by 59F3875D49FE17DB2F5D19FEB58C21D28100C6F64830F65126D1E02212D44069
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842840608987136505

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1843132733888901317
  • noteId - 1843132733888901317
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 59F3875D49FE17DB2F5D19FEB58C21D28100C6F64830F65126D1E02212D44069 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728272062166
  • tweetId - 1842840608987136505
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - der Nutzer stellt eine (rhetorische Frage), die Diskussion kann in den Kommentaren erfolgen, es ist keine Community Note nötig oder angebracht.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-07 11:09:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 06:48:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 06:15:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 00:19:58 -0500 Rating Details