Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-07 01:04:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, even if DiscussingFilm is doing this, it doesn’t warrant a CN.

Written by 6D846D0041421E214DFA96419F9FEA2F7BD39EDAD3A609C0B790D40D43C7438B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842641561483678125

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1843094938562768923
  • noteId - 1843094938562768923
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6D846D0041421E214DFA96419F9FEA2F7BD39EDAD3A609C0B790D40D43C7438B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728263051058
  • tweetId - 1842641561483678125
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN, even if DiscussingFilm is doing this, it doesn’t warrant a CN.