Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-06 23:03:55 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN: The headline describes the perspective the author argues in the article. Disagreeing with the perspective should be done in comments.

Written by 10BAF6780EBEDE4B3AC76E73C5C5E92740116B89652D2FFA6874122730FAD282
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842908611560841582

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1843064675329831352
  • noteId - 1843064675329831352
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 10BAF6780EBEDE4B3AC76E73C5C5E92740116B89652D2FFA6874122730FAD282 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728255835742
  • tweetId - 1842908611560841582
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN: The headline describes the perspective the author argues in the article. Disagreeing with the perspective should be done in comments.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-09 13:23:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 08:52:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 03:58:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 03:54:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-07 01:43:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 22:54:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 21:36:19 -0500 Rating Details