Birdwatch Note
2024-10-06 21:08:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Der Abrieb von Rotorblättern ist im Vergleich zu vielen anderen Quellen wie Autoreifen, Abfall oder selbst Schuhsohlen deutlich geringer. Es existiert kein Beleg, dass für PFAS in Wildschweinleber die Windkraft verantwortlich ist. https://faktencheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34WH7JR https://energiewende.eu/windkraft-abrieb/
Written by 3DDA96D0C8E76FF34DAAA3FAD397E0FCBDE451741DC0E53B93B5626CCA186CF5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1822262156617826512
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1843035648753819898
- noteId - 1843035648753819898
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3DDA96D0C8E76FF34DAAA3FAD397E0FCBDE451741DC0E53B93B5626CCA186CF5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728248915266
- tweetId - 1822262156617826512
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Der Abrieb von Rotorblättern ist im Vergleich zu vielen anderen Quellen wie Autoreifen, Abfall oder selbst Schuhsohlen deutlich geringer. Es existiert kein Beleg, dass für PFAS in Wildschweinleber die Windkraft verantwortlich ist. https://faktencheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34WH7JR https://energiewende.eu/windkraft-abrieb/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-07 08:14:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 07:28:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 06:10:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:14:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:13:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 01:18:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 01:07:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 00:53:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 00:08:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 23:31:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 23:31:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 22:59:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 18:30:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 17:00:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-09 19:01:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-08 05:57:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 14:44:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 13:34:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 10:40:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 08:49:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 07:03:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 03:26:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:25:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:22:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:09:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 21:32:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 21:09:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 19:05:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 08:42:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 05:55:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 05:50:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 05:17:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 04:35:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 04:34:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 04:11:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 04:04:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:47:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 02:33:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-07 00:46:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-06 21:52:21 -0500 | Rating Details |