Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-06 05:18:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

No, they don't. Numerous experts have concluded that there is no scientific basis for the controlled demolition theory. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/ https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories The collapses were caused by the impact damage from the aircraft, followed by intense fires. https://theconversation.com/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked-20-years-later-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin-towers-collapsed-167353 Another blow for WTC conspiracy theorists. https://www.machinedesign.com/home/article/21830429/another-blow-for-wtc-conspiracy-theorists https://www.journalof911studies.com/

Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842780578954801284

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1842796548864049264
  • noteId - 1842796548864049264
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728191909410
  • tweetId - 1842780578954801284
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No, they don't. Numerous experts have concluded that there is no scientific basis for the controlled demolition theory. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/ https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories The collapses were caused by the impact damage from the aircraft, followed by intense fires. https://theconversation.com/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked-20-years-later-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin-towers-collapsed-167353 Another blow for WTC conspiracy theorists. https://www.machinedesign.com/home/article/21830429/another-blow-for-wtc-conspiracy-theorists https://www.journalof911studies.com/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-06 08:42:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 07:45:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 07:02:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 03:14:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:46:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:40:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:36:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:13:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:03:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 05:27:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 03:39:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 03:30:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 03:21:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:33:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:28:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 00:59:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 00:49:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 07:29:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 07:27:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 03:32:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:33:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:19:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 01:13:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-06 00:48:42 -0500 Rating Details