Birdwatch Note
2024-10-06 03:39:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Put it in the comments where political slander belongs. The fact that “Right Wing Agenda” was used to prove a point is proof that political bias played a role in the original note is why also.
Written by 900064A728B8B0D42CD404610B638749B75E765A06C7EEB08C0182D812610764
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842666954055893402
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1842771734933418182
- noteId - 1842771734933418182
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 900064A728B8B0D42CD404610B638749B75E765A06C7EEB08C0182D812610764 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728185993308
- tweetId - 1842666954055893402
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Put it in the comments where political slander belongs. The fact that “Right Wing Agenda” was used to prove a point is proof that political bias played a role in the original note is why also.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-05 23:42:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-07 14:31:14 -0500 | Rating Details |