Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-05 16:59:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The equation as written is incorrect. “nnn” is inaccurate as a decimal expansion, more accurate is 100n + 10n +n, or 111n. It is trivial then why in the provided cases 111n/3n will equal 37. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_representation Additionally, the pattern as described would not hold for n>9

Written by 9F6238D49DEDF66A03E1A73010DE7AF8C9679E951958350592391B4B4F50E14E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841664468033659385

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1842610505271083470
  • noteId - 1842610505271083470
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9F6238D49DEDF66A03E1A73010DE7AF8C9679E951958350592391B4B4F50E14E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1728147553162
  • tweetId - 1841664468033659385
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The equation as written is incorrect. “nnn” is inaccurate as a decimal expansion, more accurate is 100n + 10n +n, or 111n. It is trivial then why in the provided cases 111n/3n will equal 37. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_representation Additionally, the pattern as described would not hold for n>9

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-05 16:27:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-16 21:35:56 -0500 Rating Details