Birdwatch Note
2024-10-05 16:36:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. That’s the user’s opinion. You can argue with them in the comments, no need for the CN.
Written by C7CEA01D386AFF63A0A71E23C2579B3F66F4911E4F8DCF97B3A92060A44C17A8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1842426992484077949
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1842604693400256671
- noteId - 1842604693400256671
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C7CEA01D386AFF63A0A71E23C2579B3F66F4911E4F8DCF97B3A92060A44C17A8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728146167504
- tweetId - 1842426992484077949
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. That’s the user’s opinion. You can argue with them in the comments, no need for the CN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-06 12:49:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-05 22:35:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-06 21:57:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-06 20:08:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-05 21:15:41 -0500 | Rating Details |