Birdwatch Note
2024-10-04 20:53:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is an example of a "positive stereotype." While it is utilized for the purpose of mocking a racist, the generalization of all black men having large penises is itself a racial stereotype and harmful. https://depts.washington.edu/sibl/Publications/Model%20Minority%20Section%20(2011).pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103112002211
Written by C60C315012B0F6EF0F4F9986C4A0DC6E1DB9DAB172B8387CB51FA22058F82139
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841531904782434736
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1842307200724963358
- noteId - 1842307200724963358
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C60C315012B0F6EF0F4F9986C4A0DC6E1DB9DAB172B8387CB51FA22058F82139 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728075239722
- tweetId - 1841531904782434736
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is an example of a "positive stereotype." While it is utilized for the purpose of mocking a racist, the generalization of all black men having large penises is itself a racial stereotype and harmful. https://depts.washington.edu/sibl/Publications/Model%20Minority%20Section%20(2011).pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103112002211
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-04 17:25:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-04 16:04:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-04 16:32:34 -0500 | Rating Details |