Birdwatch Note
2024-10-04 13:39:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
WPATH’s “Standard of Care” is not evidence-based: https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p382 WPATH - which the NHS attended until very recently - is full of activists: https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/09/disturbing-leaks-from-us-gender-group-wpath-ring-alarm-bells-in-nhs https://www.newsweek.com/gender-medicine-needs-stop-treating-young-patients-like-guinea-pigs-opinion-1878991 https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files WPATH shaped care in the UK - most change is gradual: https://sex-matters.org/posts/healthcare/wpath-in-the-uk/ WPATH suppressed their own research as disliked findings: https://x.com/donoharm/status/1790090622797246517
Written by 8AD81B24F98DC43F6443D8870808932E3FB4E6A5ADF9DE1A3D292583B9E8BF08
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841808285327917163
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1842197831416766785
- noteId - 1842197831416766785
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8AD81B24F98DC43F6443D8870808932E3FB4E6A5ADF9DE1A3D292583B9E8BF08 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1728049164047
- tweetId - 1841808285327917163
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- WPATH’s “Standard of Care” is not evidence-based: https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p382 WPATH - which the NHS attended until very recently - is full of activists: https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/09/disturbing-leaks-from-us-gender-group-wpath-ring-alarm-bells-in-nhs https://www.newsweek.com/gender-medicine-needs-stop-treating-young-patients-like-guinea-pigs-opinion-1878991 https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files WPATH shaped care in the UK - most change is gradual: https://sex-matters.org/posts/healthcare/wpath-in-the-uk/ WPATH suppressed their own research as disliked findings: https://x.com/donoharm/status/1790090622797246517