Birdwatch Note
2024-10-03 21:19:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This alleged list is unverified and misleading. This user is sensationalising the case against Diddy and using it as a means to garner engagement. https://www.vulture.com/article/diddy-lawsuit-allegations-explainer.html
Written by 8D74DAF772677E29BC22CFF2917B52D5DE6CF076BCD5538AAE393EAFE7670E13
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841949199816131070
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841951175979208708
- noteId - 1841951175979208708
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8D74DAF772677E29BC22CFF2917B52D5DE6CF076BCD5538AAE393EAFE7670E13 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727990356809
- tweetId - 1841949199816131070
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This alleged list is unverified and misleading. This user is sensationalising the case against Diddy and using it as a means to garner engagement. https://www.vulture.com/article/diddy-lawsuit-allegations-explainer.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-03 16:20:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 16:20:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 16:20:46 -0500 | Rating Details |