Birdwatch Note
2024-10-03 03:10:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The screenshot already names the MP who said this, and there's no need to restate it in a note. One can criticise the framing of the article without questioning the veracity of the quote
Written by 22F42D0C9F5384825BF69734AE9F3093DAD073441BADB839BDD7E74920FC9622
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841145027981951252
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841677220877844561
- noteId - 1841677220877844561
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 22F42D0C9F5384825BF69734AE9F3093DAD073441BADB839BDD7E74920FC9622 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727925040824
- tweetId - 1841145027981951252
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The screenshot already names the MP who said this, and there's no need to restate it in a note. One can criticise the framing of the article without questioning the veracity of the quote
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-03 02:55:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 00:53:58 -0500 | Rating Details |