Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-02 23:49:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The "60-day rule" informally in place at the DOJ only precludes "investigative steps" or indictments against a major candidate shortly before an election. Smith's filing was neither. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dojs-60-day-rule-role-play-trump-trial/story?id=107789927#:~:text=The%20report%20makes%20clear%2C%20in%20fact%2C%20that%20the%20%2260%2Dday%22%20rule%20was%20generally%20understood%20to%20relate%20to%20%22investigative%20steps%22%20or%20prosecutorial%20decisions%20%2D%2D%20which%20would%20bolster%20Bratt%27s%20argument%20that%20it%20has%20no%20application%20to%20either%20of%20Trump%27s%20cases%20brought%20in%20the%20summer%20of%20last%20year This "rule" is neither formal policy nor law. https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/fact-check-trump-justice-department-rules-prosecution-during-campaign/index.html#:~:text=For%20years%2C%20the%20Justice%20Department,close%20to%20an%20Election%20Day

Written by C9EDF27627045D5C420D1BD5BB312725708864104B0842A232B71F402FFAFE88
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1841626706089504810
• noteId - 1841626706089504810
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - C9EDF27627045D5C420D1BD5BB312725708864104B0842A232B71F402FFAFE88 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1727912997155
• tweetId - 1841617409272381697
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The "60-day rule" informally in place at the DOJ only precludes "investigative steps" or indictments against a major candidate shortly before an election. Smith's filing was neither. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dojs-60-day-rule-role-play-trump-trial/story?id=107789927#:~:text=The%20report%20makes%20clear%2C%20in%20fact%2C%20that%20the%20%2260%2Dday%22%20rule%20was%20generally%20understood%20to%20relate%20to%20%22investigative%20steps%22%20or%20prosecutorial%20decisions%20%2D%2D%20which%20would%20bolster%20Bratt%27s%20argument%20that%20it%20has%20no%20application%20to%20either%20of%20Trump%27s%20cases%20brought%20in%20the%20summer%20of%20last%20year This "rule" is neither formal policy nor law. https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/fact-check-trump-justice-department-rules-prosecution-during-campaign/index.html#:~:text=For%20years%2C%20the%20Justice%20Department,close%20to%20an%20Election%20Day