Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 21:02:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Whist the Social Democrats may have called for a higher rate of stamp duty, the screenshot clearly shows that the party did not vote for the policy.
Written by 1535F5F08F917A947E5C06F583A5BF443F28BD139152A4CFBBFA932830770B97
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841226111801311316
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841584540277428426
- noteId - 1841584540277428426
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1535F5F08F917A947E5C06F583A5BF443F28BD139152A4CFBBFA932830770B97 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727902944045
- tweetId - 1841226111801311316
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Whist the Social Democrats may have called for a higher rate of stamp duty, the screenshot clearly shows that the party did not vote for the policy.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-02 17:05:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 16:13:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 11:42:00 -0500 | Rating Details |