Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-02 19:21:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, while France’s nuclear power is generated at 4g/kWh, not all of France’s power is generated from Nuclear. The 56g figure is correct for all power France has generated in 2023 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290216/carbon-intensity-power-sector-france/ What’s more, the proposed note is agreeing with the thrust of the original post.

Written by 0291FE3E590C95F1606E76C7001176FBCFAB9C4ACF2901A838F8A08C03A53ABD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841270792526434453

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1841559112058077316
  • noteId - 1841559112058077316
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0291FE3E590C95F1606E76C7001176FBCFAB9C4ACF2901A838F8A08C03A53ABD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727896881486
  • tweetId - 1841270792526434453
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN, while France’s nuclear power is generated at 4g/kWh, not all of France’s power is generated from Nuclear. The 56g figure is correct for all power France has generated in 2023 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290216/carbon-intensity-power-sector-france/ What’s more, the proposed note is agreeing with the thrust of the original post.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-02 19:17:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:57:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:27:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:21:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:09:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 17:56:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 17:47:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 17:40:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 17:00:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 16:57:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:43:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:42:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:34:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:04:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 14:53:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 14:36:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 14:28:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 02:13:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:56:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:49:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:45:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:30:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:13:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:07:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 22:01:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 21:46:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 21:25:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 21:06:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 20:24:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:44:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 18:01:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 16:22:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:02:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 14:31:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-04 06:27:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 15:18:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 14:35:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 00:32:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-03 14:18:46 -0500 Rating Details