Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 16:25:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - C'est une des tentatives de note la plus stupide que j'ai vu. Arkunir partage son avis et donc ne nécessite pas de notes.
Written by F0EDFE417CC35A59A0DCFE6092C5E337E68E689AE3D20E587280C6BBB3B54445
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840845448820531308
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841514880865653056
- noteId - 1841514880865653056
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F0EDFE417CC35A59A0DCFE6092C5E337E68E689AE3D20E587280C6BBB3B54445 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727886335947
- tweetId - 1840845448820531308
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - C'est une des tentatives de note la plus stupide que j'ai vu. Arkunir partage son avis et donc ne nécessite pas de notes.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-17 15:33:09 -0500 | Rating Details |