Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 13:28:08 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
El post sí existió pero fue borrado posteriormente, yo personalmente lo vi y cuando se mostró por televisión seguía estando publicado
Written by 843B1D3FB2D06C0BE16D53C4AF206EA9C325D205CC673A0F59FD210CF3F426EF
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841233118776172904
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841470220931600601
- noteId - 1841470220931600601
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 843B1D3FB2D06C0BE16D53C4AF206EA9C325D205CC673A0F59FD210CF3F426EF Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727875688188
- tweetId - 1841233118776172904
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- El post sí existió pero fue borrado posteriormente, yo personalmente lo vi y cuando se mostró por televisión seguía estando publicado
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-02 12:35:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 09:57:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 09:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 08:52:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 08:29:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 22:50:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 13:16:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-02 09:36:40 -0500 | Rating Details |