Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-02 07:15:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

元ポストでも「食用での養殖」と書いているため、誤解を招いておらず、よってノートは不要です。

Written by 247B9EBC85A12DD8EAE232B8E7B94D19168FE6A288DE5E0E50ECAE95977DFD01
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841279909089685578

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1841376563159535723
  • noteId - 1841376563159535723
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 247B9EBC85A12DD8EAE232B8E7B94D19168FE6A288DE5E0E50ECAE95977DFD01 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727853358442
  • tweetId - 1841279909089685578
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • 元ポストでも「食用での養殖」と書いているため、誤解を招いておらず、よってノートは不要です。

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-02 06:21:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 02:27:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 02:21:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 02:20:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 02:17:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 02:21:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-02 07:18:48 -0500 Rating Details