Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 03:34:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The other note is stating what the post says. It’s clear that note writer didn’t understand the post.
Written by 914A0D56079E0934BB9CC282A54B69BACB427A90916F3F09E3E40BD8D4723186
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841194087711424713
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841320952761606359
- noteId - 1841320952761606359
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 914A0D56079E0934BB9CC282A54B69BACB427A90916F3F09E3E40BD8D4723186 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727840099885
- tweetId - 1841194087711424713
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The other note is stating what the post says. It’s clear that note writer didn’t understand the post.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-01 22:48:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 22:42:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 22:54:23 -0500 | Rating Details |