Birdwatch Note
2024-10-01 22:11:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It was not deleted. It was and still is on @stephaniebice. The gentleman confused @stephaniebice and @RepBice accounts for #OK05. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whoops
Written by 7C87BF1394146495D4D80785A9836AAB39B89730ADBEDAA81F70A56FD071CF3A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841138874761842962
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841239646891553071
- noteId - 1841239646891553071
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7C87BF1394146495D4D80785A9836AAB39B89730ADBEDAA81F70A56FD071CF3A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727820715055
- tweetId - 1841138874761842962
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It was not deleted. It was and still is on @stephaniebice. The gentleman confused @stephaniebice and @RepBice accounts for #OK05. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whoops
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-01 17:49:59 -0500 | Rating Details |