Birdwatch Note
2024-10-01 12:18:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Het artikel van Weyts is van 20-11-2015 zoals te zien is in de screenshot. Artikel van De Ridder is van 1-10-2024. Deze twee maatregelen zijn dus niet een en-en verhaal. https://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20241001_92914571
Written by 3A45A1EFFE6A9683B17D7937A3904C4F5D5FE7F060F2BE34F104E1B815EAE1F6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841039245604979063
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841090362321895499
- noteId - 1841090362321895499
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3A45A1EFFE6A9683B17D7937A3904C4F5D5FE7F060F2BE34F104E1B815EAE1F6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727785122838
- tweetId - 1841039245604979063
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Het artikel van Weyts is van 20-11-2015 zoals te zien is in de screenshot. Artikel van De Ridder is van 1-10-2024. Deze twee maatregelen zijn dus niet een en-en verhaal. https://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20241001_92914571
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-02 10:08:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 07:50:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 10:04:27 -0500 | Rating Details |