Birdwatch Note
2024-09-30 18:33:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the post is factual, no implication of date. Also ironically the "controversial" part was BECAUSE he had brushes with the law https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna334001
Written by F54A3318AFA84C92EDB1F3AA630E50EEEF3F0E08D0399CCE60FB3F213B8C4002
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840468445579612344
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1840822362591404505
- noteId - 1840822362591404505
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F54A3318AFA84C92EDB1F3AA630E50EEEF3F0E08D0399CCE60FB3F213B8C4002 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727721226724
- tweetId - 1840468445579612344
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - the post is factual, no implication of date. Also ironically the "controversial" part was BECAUSE he had brushes with the law https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna334001
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-30 15:22:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-30 14:50:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-30 14:08:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-30 13:58:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-30 13:41:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-30 14:15:18 -0500 | Rating Details |