Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-30 13:04:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The post expresses an opinion about a political advertisement. Those who disagree should hash it out in the replies instead of abusing CNs.

Written by BF282A7D2850DBEBD4B770D1E86C77054C391ABC550884CF6C581CB20DA7CD7E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840382330780938478

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1840739530195808587
  • noteId - 1840739530195808587
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BF282A7D2850DBEBD4B770D1E86C77054C391ABC550884CF6C581CB20DA7CD7E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727701477942
  • tweetId - 1840382330780938478
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. The post expresses an opinion about a political advertisement. Those who disagree should hash it out in the replies instead of abusing CNs.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-30 17:55:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 14:45:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 13:00:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 10:50:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 08:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 08:36:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 08:07:46 -0500 Rating Details