Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-30 12:51:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The statistics do not support this claim. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2024001/article/00001-eng.htm#

Written by F554211531C0F0663711E42336651778539A794C23DDA17C2ABD72A3F7EEF65A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840547007338844373

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1840736335323144448
  • noteId - 1840736335323144448
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F554211531C0F0663711E42336651778539A794C23DDA17C2ABD72A3F7EEF65A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727700716225
  • tweetId - 1840547007338844373
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The statistics do not support this claim. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2024001/article/00001-eng.htm#

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-30 13:13:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 11:29:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 08:03:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-01 00:19:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 23:10:42 -0500 Rating Details