Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-28 09:27:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - Fandom isn't a reliable source. Even if it were, none of the listed links actually confirm the character's sexuality, so the sources do not support the claim.

Written by E16D8940205F2AE017B23FDDCE2D792A0AEE1CFE3A2722D0BD4B092AA8CC293E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1811764815280423011

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1839960235068313658
  • noteId - 1839960235068313658
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E16D8940205F2AE017B23FDDCE2D792A0AEE1CFE3A2722D0BD4B092AA8CC293E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727515679506
  • tweetId - 1811764815280423011
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - Fandom isn't a reliable source. Even if it were, none of the listed links actually confirm the character's sexuality, so the sources do not support the claim.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-03 22:40:52 -0500 Rating Details