Birdwatch Note
2024-09-28 07:18:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Post is factually correct. If you want to debate why the 101st Airborne and RAF are there, use the comments
Written by 9DFD21082E7B24362F61FD314547E808C5BD82E78C58ED1979162C7605074781
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1839586122449523077
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1839927682521285049
- noteId - 1839927682521285049
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9DFD21082E7B24362F61FD314547E808C5BD82E78C58ED1979162C7605074781 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727507918373
- tweetId - 1839586122449523077
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Post is factually correct. If you want to debate why the 101st Airborne and RAF are there, use the comments
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-28 02:27:25 -0500 | Rating Details |