Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-26 21:46:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The legal landscape has changed since the AWB expired. SCOTUS has ruled weapons in common use—and the ammunition they require—cannot be banned. With more than 20 million ARs in circulation, these weapons are unquestionably in common use and cannot be banned. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/what-part-of-in-common-use-dont-you-understand-how-courts-have-defied-heller-in-arms-ban-cases-again-mark-w-smith/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

Written by 21FCF70A80293F196A7CB932A89C4FAAA89E62BBDAF33EDD8CBB35B057A4561F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1839421203163046186
• noteId - 1839421203163046186
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 21FCF70A80293F196A7CB932A89C4FAAA89E62BBDAF33EDD8CBB35B057A4561F Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1727387164284
• tweetId - 1839413400503308529
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The legal landscape has changed since the AWB expired. SCOTUS has ruled weapons in common use—and the ammunition they require—cannot be banned. With more than 20 million ARs in circulation, these weapons are unquestionably in common use and cannot be banned. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/what-part-of-in-common-use-dont-you-understand-how-courts-have-defied-heller-in-arms-ban-cases-again-mark-w-smith/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/