Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-26 15:44:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The OP has plenty of people calling them out in comments for believing a fan account was the actual person. The CN should be in comments as well. NNN.

Written by C22351EE33D30C1251922B90DA66F8E25E352D80BE0581E51F23CF4292560AB5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1839122282985435648

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1839330237894610978
  • noteId - 1839330237894610978
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C22351EE33D30C1251922B90DA66F8E25E352D80BE0581E51F23CF4292560AB5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727365476475
  • tweetId - 1839122282985435648
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The OP has plenty of people calling them out in comments for believing a fan account was the actual person. The CN should be in comments as well. NNN.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-26 17:52:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-26 13:26:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-26 11:56:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-26 10:45:46 -0500 Rating Details