Birdwatch Note
2024-09-25 12:17:23 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Misleading, 1. OP chooses image of white dwarf stars, dim, stellar corpses. Unlikely to be life on any planets. 2. These are stars, extremely unlikely life on a star! 3. Image doesn't show that many stars, so there doesn't 'have' to be life on any planets around them. https://science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-uncovers-the-fading-cinders-of-some-of-our-galaxys-earliest-homesteaders/ https://www.space.com/23756-white-dwarf-stars.html https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/star-colours
Written by 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1838550952468431294
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1838915700930322477
- noteId - 1838915700930322477
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727266643160
- tweetId - 1838550952468431294
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Misleading, 1. OP chooses image of white dwarf stars, dim, stellar corpses. Unlikely to be life on any planets. 2. These are stars, extremely unlikely life on a star! 3. Image doesn't show that many stars, so there doesn't 'have' to be life on any planets around them. https://science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-uncovers-the-fading-cinders-of-some-of-our-galaxys-earliest-homesteaders/ https://www.space.com/23756-white-dwarf-stars.html https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/star-colours
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-26 22:43:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 16:49:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 15:54:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 14:36:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 14:02:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 09:19:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 08:28:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 08:23:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 08:00:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-25 07:28:15 -0500 | Rating Details |