Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-24 11:03:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

OP zitiert eine offizielle statistik, zu sagen, die dunkelziffer sei höher mag vielleicht stimmen, fällt aber ins reich der spekulation.

Written by AA3ECB5F26EBF64CBE4AEB7ACE477D4093BC9D725897A51C7D1FD5C37C392324
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1838169097059594747

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1838534658176286951
  • noteId - 1838534658176286951
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AA3ECB5F26EBF64CBE4AEB7ACE477D4093BC9D725897A51C7D1FD5C37C392324 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1727175795489
  • tweetId - 1838169097059594747
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • OP zitiert eine offizielle statistik, zu sagen, die dunkelziffer sei höher mag vielleicht stimmen, fällt aber ins reich der spekulation.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-25 02:46:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-24 20:30:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-24 16:12:52 -0500 Rating Details