Birdwatch Note
2024-09-24 07:04:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
There is no mention of Springfield in the OP. Current note is therefore irrelevant. Please keep discussion to comments.
Written by 832BCBEB32B74D3E6792B307897FE40DB330B8087A703892AA7E59CB0E8F9594
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1838382727030055079
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1838474476016505340
- noteId - 1838474476016505340
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 832BCBEB32B74D3E6792B307897FE40DB330B8087A703892AA7E59CB0E8F9594 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727161446943
- tweetId - 1838382727030055079
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- There is no mention of Springfield in the OP. Current note is therefore irrelevant. Please keep discussion to comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-24 11:23:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-24 08:46:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-24 07:43:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-24 04:22:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-24 03:15:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-24 02:14:09 -0500 | Rating Details |