Birdwatch Note
2024-09-23 09:06:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Le post initial ne mentionne ni proportions, ni chiffres erronés qu'il faudrait corriger. Ces données chiffrées sont certes intéressantes pour alimenter un débat, mais n'ont pas leur place en CN.
Written by 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837960308427522380
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1838142922820063496
- noteId - 1838142922820063496
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727082398500
- tweetId - 1837960308427522380
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Le post initial ne mentionne ni proportions, ni chiffres erronés qu'il faudrait corriger. Ces données chiffrées sont certes intéressantes pour alimenter un débat, mais n'ont pas leur place en CN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-23 11:03:22 -0500 | Rating Details |