Birdwatch Note
2024-09-23 08:41:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN the science is not settled. There are many interpretations. Some more mainstream as others. Author is using Von Neumann chains interpretation. Leave critique in the comments.
Written by 0D0044D0666FBBE4559F6855472FC30D9BD1AF0C2E702A87764EDC541A4E8D2C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837863958306234653
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1838136556944572796
- noteId - 1838136556944572796
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0D0044D0666FBBE4559F6855472FC30D9BD1AF0C2E702A87764EDC541A4E8D2C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727080880757
- tweetId - 1837863958306234653
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN the science is not settled. There are many interpretations. Some more mainstream as others. Author is using Von Neumann chains interpretation. Leave critique in the comments.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-23 14:59:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-23 08:35:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-23 06:57:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-23 06:49:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-23 04:51:35 -0500 | Rating Details |