Birdwatch Note
2024-09-22 19:53:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
L’affirmation est trompeuse. Une étude du BMJ montre que la consanguinité touche surtout certaines communautés pakistanaises au Royaume-Uni (pratique culturelle, non religieuse), pas 50% des musulmans. Aucune preuve que la majorité des enfants handicapés sont musulmans. https://jmg.bmj.com/content/25/3/186 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4374
Written by 36359E6950591471BAB44095C3D987FDD69303BCC67AE221B23C4D7B5ABD0F42
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837771498637217921
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837943198318317691
- noteId - 1837943198318317691
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 36359E6950591471BAB44095C3D987FDD69303BCC67AE221B23C4D7B5ABD0F42 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1727034780469
- tweetId - 1837771498637217921
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- L’affirmation est trompeuse. Une étude du BMJ montre que la consanguinité touche surtout certaines communautés pakistanaises au Royaume-Uni (pratique culturelle, non religieuse), pas 50% des musulmans. Aucune preuve que la majorité des enfants handicapés sont musulmans. https://jmg.bmj.com/content/25/3/186 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4374
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-23 17:58:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 05:24:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 03:53:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 03:17:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 03:03:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 01:51:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-23 00:06:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 23:28:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 21:15:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 21:08:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 18:36:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 17:44:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 17:39:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 17:35:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 16:20:16 -0500 | Rating Details |